Cetaphil vs Neutrogena

Which One’s Better? Cetaphil vs Neutrogena: Complete Guide

We’re confident that you’ve previously noticed Cetaphil and Neutrogena on the shelves of your neighborhood pharmacy. But which one ought you pick? 


Best Cleanser Overall

They’re not really as gentle as they’re painted to be, to be honest. A number of parabens found in Cetaphil’s Gentle Skin Cleanser have been linked to contact dermatitis and skin sensitization. Although Neutrogena’s Hydro Boost Gel Cleanser doesn’t include nearly as many flagrant offenders, it isn’t completely free of them either because it also contains perfumes that have been shown to cause skin sensitization. To know your skin type and understand it better, read this.

There is some good news, though! Of course, both cleansers offer unique features that may exceed their drawbacks; otherwise, how do you believe they became so popular?

People with folliculitis are particularly fond of Cetaphil’s cleanser (also known as Malassezia, or fungal acne). This is due to the fact that the parabens we were concerned about also work quite well as antifungal agents. It is also fantastic for people with frequent acne because it is totally oil-free, non-comedogenic, and astringent without being overly drying (thanks to the inclusion of cetyl and stearyl alcohol).

The reason why Neutrogena’s cleanser is so well-liked is entirely unrelated to hydration. Its fresh water-like gel texture and very moisturising composition, which includes Hydrolyzed Hyaluronic Acid, Glycerin, and Vitamin E, make it the ideal face cleanser for people with dry skin.

Therefore, despite the fact that both of their main selling points are supposed to be their gentleness, they are effective cleansers for quite opposite reasons. To sum up, Cetaphil’s Gentle Skin Cleanser is great if you have acne or fungal acne, whilst Neutrogena’s Hydro Boost Gel Cleanser is ideal if you’re looking to treat dryness.


The Neutrogena Oil-Free Face & Neck Moisturizer vs. Cetaphil Daily Hydrating Lotion comparison pits two of their most well-liked moisturisers against one another. Their effectiveness is supported by the tens of thousands of positive reviews they have received combined, but there are a few things to keep in mind before making a purchase.

Best Moisturiser Overall

They both place a strong emphasis on the moisture barrier, which is their most obvious commonality. There are many excellent moisturisers that rapidly and efficiently bind moisture to the skin, but surprisingly few target the true underlying cause of dryness, dullness, and dehydration: a compromised or broken moisture barrier.

Dermatologists recommend ingredients like glycerin and glyceryl stearate, which are present in both Neutrogena’s and Cetaphil’s moisturisers. These ingredients actively work to strengthen your skin’s natural protective barrier, improving your skin’s capacity to retain moisture and giving you that much-desired radiant glow.

They both lack oil, which is the second evident resemblance. This guarantees that they are non-comedogenic and makes them particularly suitable for people with troubled, combination, or oily skin. Unfortunately, the silicone content of both items is a commonality. This merits careful consideration because a tiny percentage of people have reported experiencing skin sensitivity from silicones, which is similar to a mild allergy. 

To add to this, Neutrogena’s contains parabens, which have a similar history of causing problems. In spite of what the general public thinks, it is crucial to patch test all new skincare products before using them on your face.

The presence of tocopherol (also known as Vitamin E), a wonder ingredient recognised for its potent antioxidant advantages as well as additional moisture barrier-supporting properties, makes up for Neutrogena’s substance-related transgressions. It ultimately depends on you if this compensates for the use of silicones and parabens as some individuals even enjoy the way these substances make their skin feel. But as for us, we like Cetaphil’s Daily Hydrating Lotion better.


Overall Ideal Sunscreen

Now, choosing this is simpler for us. Unfortunately, Oxybenzone is a chemical in Neutrogena’s products. There are several adverse effects of oxybenzone. It is recognised as a potentially harmful eye irritant and, as an allergen, is known to cause skin allergies. Additionally, it interferes with the production of human testosterone and oestrogen.

The Daily Facial Moisturizer with SPF 50+ from Cetaphil emphasises that it is absolutely free of oxybenzone precisely for this reason, and we at Glamyourbeauty strongly suggest it over Neutrogena’s. However, we still personally err on the side of Cetaphil on this one, especially since Cetaphil’s doubles as a day cream with fantastic moisturising & antioxidant benefits. 


The conclusions we reached from the moisturiser comparison nicely correspond to the agreement about the two products as a whole. To recap, despite a plethora of gentleness promises, both regrettably fall just a little short because their formulae frequently contain potentially irritating substances like silicones and parabens. But if you’re prepared to patch test and are fortunate enough to have skin that is unaffected by such substances, you can benefit greatly from their products because they place a strong emphasis on preserving your skin’s natural moisture barrier.

This article compared the most well-liked, best-selling goods from the two brands in order to avoid going on and on. Here are our suggestions for the alternative skincare products that Neutrogena and Cetaphil sell, though, to wrap up our review.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.